Scenario Comparison

Compare conservative, baseline, and aggressive projections

Back to Simulator

Conservative

Lower growth, cautious assumptions

Annual Revenue

$2,911,248

EBITDA Margin

73.86%

Break-even Month

Month 1

Key Assumptions

  • Patients/month: 30
  • Growth rate: 2%
  • Ablation: $2,200
  • Marketing: $12,000/mo

Baseline

Realistic, achievable projections

Annual Revenue

$9,274,290

EBITDA Margin

88.85%

Break-even Month

Month 1

Key Assumptions

  • Patients/month: 50
  • Growth rate: 5%
  • Ablation: $2,500
  • Marketing: $10,000/mo

Aggressive

High growth, optimistic scenario

Annual Revenue

$26,066,421

EBITDA Margin

94.67%

Break-even Month

Month 1

Key Assumptions

  • Patients/month: 75
  • Growth rate: 8%
  • Ablation: $2,800
  • Marketing: $8,000/mo

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricConservativeBaselineAggressive
First Year Revenue$2,295,499$5,164,272$10,351,335
Annual Revenue (Year 2)$2,911,248$9,274,290$26,066,421
First Year EBITDA$1,695,499$4,588,272$9,799,335
Annual EBITDA (Year 2)$2,311,248$8,698,290$25,514,421
EBITDA Margin73.86%88.85%94.67%
Break-even MonthMonth 1Month 1Month 1
Valuation (6x EBITDA)$13,867,488$52,189,740$153,086,526

Conservative Use Case

Best for risk-averse planning and worst-case scenario preparation. Assumes slower market penetration, lower reimbursement rates, and higher marketing costs to acquire patients.

Baseline Use Case

Most likely scenario based on industry benchmarks and realistic market conditions. Represents achievable targets with proper execution and standard market conditions.

Aggressive Use Case

Optimistic scenario assuming strong market demand, excellent referral network development, and favorable reimbursement environment. Requires excellent execution.